Legal Opinion

City of Seattle v. Chin Let

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1898No. 2811PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County. — Hon. Obange Jacobs, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Gobdox, J.

Bespondent .was prosecuted in the municipal court, of the city of Seattle, for violating the ordinance of that city relating to lotteries. The section of the ordinance in question is as follows:

“ Section 11. Whoever shall maintain or run, or be in any manner connected with, any lottery or any establishment or business, by whatever name it may be known, wherein any property is sold or disposed of by chance, or whoever shall, within the city, sell or dispose of any lottery ticket or share either for religious or secular purposes, or *40any chance,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Mankato v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  2. City of Davenport v. RiceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
  3. City of Seattle v. PearsonWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  4. City of Tacoma v. Commercial Electric Light & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Kennedy v. PeopleColorado Court of Appeals · 1897

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. Reader's Digest Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  2. State Ex Rel. Evans v. Brotherhood of FriendsWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  3. City of Bellingham v. SchamperaWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Clark v. AllowayIdaho Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Society Theatre v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1922

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API