Legal Opinion

Holtz v. . Schmidt

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 15, 1874PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Schmidt Co., the defendants, who at the time were importers of wines and liquors, doing business in the city of New York, on the 20th day of March, 1867, proposed to the plaintiff, a dealer in the same articles in that city, that he should purchase from them such goods as he should require in his business. An arrangement was finally made between them that the plaintiff should from time to time order such wines and liquors from the defendants as he chose, and that the price should be the subject of an express or implied agreement at the time the orders were made. The referee found that in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Schwinger v. . HickokNew York Court of Appeals · 1873

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wickham & Burton Coal Co. v. Farmers Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1920
  2. Stout v. Caruthersville Hardware Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1908
  3. Cohen v. Berlin & Jones Envelope Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  4. Lenz v. BrownWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Plumb v. J. W. Hallauer & Sons Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API