In Re Fee
Arizona Supreme Court
1DissentCorcoran, Justice
I respectfully dissent.
I view the facts in this case differently from the majority. The respondents Fee and Montijo lied to the settlement judge so that they would get more money and their client would get less money. It is especially egregious for a lawyer to lie to a judge for the purpose of increasing his own fees at the direct expense of his client. I cannot agree with the committee, the commission, and the majority that respondents lacked dishonest or selfish motives. Bes ipsa loquitur. Such conduct warrants at least a suspension and not a mere censure.
*603Respondents allege that they…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Carter v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1995
- Smith v. MyersArizona Supreme Court · 1994