Legal Opinion

City of Ardmore v. Knight

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 30, 1954No. 35989PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALLEY, Chief Justice.

This is an action by the City of Ardmore against Mattie Knight and others to quiet title to the West 90 feet of Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 38 of the City. The trial court found against the City and in favor of the defendants, E. Dunlap, Jr., and G. W. Clay, on their cross-petitions and quieted title in them to the portions claimed by each in the tract of land involved. The City of Ardmore has appealed. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court or by name.

The City of Ardmore submits four propositions but all of the contentions center around two…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Duffield v. DuffieldIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Santa Fe, L. E. R. Co. v. LauneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Orth v. GregorySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Rixford v. ZeiglerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Wiseman v. McNultyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. Buckhorn Ranch PartnershipSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
  2. Jones v. Alpine Investments, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  3. Kelly v. City of BethanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  4. Schneider v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  5. Dunlap v. City of ArdmoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API