Legal Opinion
Artem Rossa v. USCIS
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided October 8, 2025No. 2:25-cv-01889Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4 * * * 5 Artem Rossa, Case No. 2:25-cv-01889-ART-DJA 6 Petitioner, 7 Order v. 8 USCIS, 9 Respondent. 10 11 Pro se Petitioner Artem Rossa filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (which 12 means to proceed without paying the filing fee). (ECF No. 1). However, Rossa’s application is 13 missing certain information. The Court thus denies Rossa’s application without prejudice. 14 I. Discussion. 15 Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), a plaintiff may bring a civil action “without prepayment of 16 fees or security therefor” if the plaintiff…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Adkins v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Maria Escobedo v. Apple American GroupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. William F. McQuade and Wilma N. McQuadeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Kennedy v. HuibregtseCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Robert W. Kortus v. Jeffery S. WeihsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001