Bruha v. La Crosse Plow Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.
It was contended at the trial, upon oral argument and in briefs of counsel here, that the plaintiff accepted the principal of his note, with interest to November 22, 1926, in full satisfaction and accord of his claim. We find it unnecessary to determine that question. It appears without dispute that the entire principal was paid. The payment is so indorsed upon the back of the note; ninety per cent of the principal having been paid February 5, 1930, and the remaining ten per cent having been paid February 23, 1931, all interest being paid to November 22, 1926. The note, being payable upon…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Stewart v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Barry v. MinahanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
- Bennett v. Federal Coal & Coke Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1912
- Lash v. LambertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1870
3Cited by4 opinions
- Accola v. GieseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
- London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. v. AllenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- Perry v. RiskeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Dawn L SchroederUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2019