Legal Opinion

Duralith Corp. v. Van Houten

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided September 27, 1934PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Lloyd, J.

This was an action on a check given in pursuance of a written contract providing for the purchase of a paint material known as “Duralith.” The contract was executed by the parties, and the purchasers (the defendants) became the distributor and dealer for the plaintiff’s paints in the city of Paterson.

The defense to the action was that one Lieberman, sales agent of the plaintiff, had made certain representations to induce the making of the contract, which representations were false and material; that the contract had been in consequence…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bridger v. . GoldsmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. Granlund v. SarafMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ocean Cape Hotel Corp. v. Masefield Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  2. SERIES PUBLISHERS, INC. v. GreeneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  3. SCHLOSSMAN'S, INC. v. NiewinskiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  4. May v. HuffNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API