Legal Opinion

State v. Mendenhall

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 7, 2007No. 40,986-KAPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Remand

SEXTON, J.

| ¶ This matter is on remand from the supreme court for consideration of remaining issues in the appeal following the supreme court’s reversal of our decision on the issue of the sufficiency of the advisement of Defendant, Derrell Mendenhall, of his right of confrontation. Finding no merit in the remaining assignments of error, we affirm Defendant’s conviction and sentence.

DISCUSSION

Defendant pled guilty to attempted distribution of marijuana, admitting that he knowingly and intentionally attempted to distribute marijuana to a confidential informant. He was sentenced to…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. State v. DortheySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  3. State v. CrosbySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
  4. State v. BonannoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
  5. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. CummingsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. State v. WatsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. State v. FordLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. State v. WarrenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. State v. MaffettLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API