Legal Opinion

Redevelopment Authority v. Piccolino

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 7, 2012No. 277 C.D. 2011PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge LEAVITT.

The Redevelopment Authority of the City of Scranton (Redevelopment Authority) appeals two orders of the Lackawanna County Court of Common Pleas (trial court). It appeals an order of January 20, 2011, sustaining the preliminary objections of Mario and Giuseppina Piccolino and Stanley and Susan Stadolny (Landowners) to the Redevelopment Authority’s condemnation of their properties. It also appeals an order of March 31, 2008, denying the Redevelopment Authority’s petition to disqualify Landowners’ counsel. We affirm the trial court’s order on Landowners’ preliminary…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. In Re Condemnation by the Urban Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Delaware River Preservation Co. v. MiskinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. In Re Condemnation of Lands Situate and Being in the City of ScrantonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Hanni AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Condemnation by Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. In Re: Condemnation of Land in Bucks County, PA Located at 183 Buck Road ~ Appeal of: Mill Race Inn, Ltd.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API