Shipp v. O'DOWD
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WILSON, Justice.
Limitation is the question in this action concerning a building contract. The precise issue is when plaintiffs’ cause of action arose. The trial court granted defendant’s motion for judgment non obstante veredicto, holding the action was barred. We affirm.
Plaintiffs filed their suit November 1, 1968. It was alleged they entered into a written contract in February, 1964 whereby defendant was to construct for them a residence building in accordance with written plans and specifications; that defendant “failed to construct said house in accordance with the specifications…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Humber v. MortonTexas Supreme Court · 1968
- Luling Oil & Gas Co. v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1945
- Fort Smith v. Fairbanks, Morse CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1907
- Owen v. KingTexas Supreme Court · 1938
- Summers v. Bransford-Hinds Building CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Myers v. McDonaldUtah Supreme Court · 1981
- Cass v. Stephens, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2004
- Brooks Fashion Stores, Inc. v. Northpark National Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1985
- L.C.L. Theatres, Inc., a Texas Corporation v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Stiles v. Union Carbide Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.