Mitchell v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Sims
Affirming.
Berry Mitchell and Paul Baumgardner were jointly tried upon an indictment charging them with robbery. Both were convicted and Mitchell’s punishment was fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for five years, while Baumgardner was given two years. They urge two grounds for reversal of the judgment; 1. The court erred in refusing to hear oral testimony on their application for a change of venue; 2. the verdict is not supported by the evidence and is the result of passion and prejudice.
Unfortunately for appellants, no reference is made in the motion for a new trial to the court’s…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Arnold v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
- Harter v. Lewis Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1951
- Moore v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946
- Hanks v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- Bowling v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Arrington v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1961
- Keathley v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1953