Agrizap, Inc. v. Woodstream Corp.

MEMORANDUM

ROBERT F. KELLY, Senior District Judge.

Presently pending before this Court is Defendant Woodstream Corporation’s Motion for Clarification of this Court’s August 23, 2006 Memorandum Opinion (“Opinion”). That Opinion granted Wood-stream’s Motion for Summary Judgment for all of Plaintiff Agrizap. Inc.’s state law claims except for its fraudulent misrepresentation claim. In its Second Amended Complaint, Agrizap alleged six different fraudulent misrepresentations made by Woodstream. The issue in need of clarification is whether only one of these fraudulent misrepresentation claims…