Thompson v. Collier-Reynolds Grocery Co.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
This appeal is from a judgment rendered upon a verdict returned in appellee’s favor tinder the direction of the court. In testing the correctness of this action we must therefore view the testimony and the inferences reasonably deducible therefrom in the light most favorable to appellant. As thus viewed, the facts may be stated as follows:
Appellee is a corporation engaged in the wholesale grocery business in the city of Pine Bluff, and one Pritchard was employed by it as a traveling salesman. In the discharge of his duties he used an automobile, which he took to appellant’s shop to be…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ferguson v. GuydonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
- Forrest v. BensonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
- Gilstrap v. StahlSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
3Cited by1 opinion
- Southern Bauxite Co. v. Brown-Pearson Cash Feed StoreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926