Legal Opinion

Murchison Nat. Bank v. Reynolds

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 2, 1918No. 10065PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Before Spain, ]'., Darlington, Summer term, 1917. Action by the Murchison National Bank against J. B. Reynolds and-others.

Read the full summary

Before Spain, ]'., Darlington, Summer term, 1917. Action by the Murchison National Bank against J. B. Reynolds and-others. From order of reference after judgment for plaintiff, defendants, Ernest Clifford Reynolds and others, appeal. submit: That any order referring a cause to an attorney, who had been counsel in the cause, is in violation of the law: Constitution of 1895, article V, section 6. The order of reference made before defendants had answered, was premature, and should have been set aside for mistake: 105 S. C. 139; 27 S. C. 622; 3 S. E. 80; 32 S. C. 285. Appellants are not…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Fraser.

Respondent’s statement of the case: “This action was commenced against the defendants, J. B. Reynolds and Minnie F. Reynolds, some time during the year 1911, for the foreclosure of the mortgage described in the complaint, which said defendants alleged had been paid and satisfied. A judgment against said defendants for the full amount demanded in the complaint for the foreclosure of .said mort gage and the sale of the mortgaged premises was obtained. After the land had been advertised for sale pursuant to said judgment, and before the…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Stafford's EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API