Legal Opinion
Deville v. Calogero
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided April 24, 1996No. 96-162PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
673 So.2d 1175 (1996)
Elton DEVILLE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Gina Rush CALOGERO and Louis Mann, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 96-162.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.
April 24, 1996.
Elton Deville, pro se.
Gina Rush Calogero, pro se.
Before DOUCET, KNOLL and COOKS, JJ.
KNOLL, Judge.
This court issued a rule to show cause to the plaintiff-appellant, Elton Deville, why the above captioned appeal should not be dismissed on the ground that the judgment was a nonappealable interlocutory ruling. We hereby dismiss the appeal.
The plaintiff filed this petition for damages against the defendants, Gina Rush…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State, Department of Highways v. McDonaldLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
- Reilly v. StateLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1988
- Spangenberg v. Yale Materials Handling-La.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
- Long v. ABC Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
- State, Department of Highways v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
3Cited by8 opinions
- Augman v. City of Morgan CityLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2005
- Crystal Moore v. Christopher P. MooreLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2022
- First Family Financial Services, Inc. v. CeasarLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2005
- First Family Financial Services, Inc. v. Ron CeasarLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2005
- Langley v. Bechtel Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.