Crew-Levick Co. v. British & Foreign Marine Ins.

DALLAS, Circuit Judge.

The policy sued upon covered “oil contained in tank cars.” The question is whether the loss, which admittedly occurred, though of oil in tank cars, was one for which the defendant had contracted to indemnify the plaintiff. The right solution of this question depends upon what is the correct construction of the piolicy respecting its continuance. In the form used there is contained, in print, the language:

“Beginning the adventure upon the said goods and merchandise from and immediately following the loading thereof on board of the said vessel, at -, as aforesaid, and so…