Legal Opinion

New York Central and Hudson River Rd. Co. v. . Cottle

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 27, 1920PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered July 21, 1919, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying, a motion to confirm the report of a referee in a proceeding to determine the right, title and interest of the various defendants to an award in condemnation proceedings.

Read the full summary

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered July 21, 1919, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying, a motion to confirm the report of a referee in a proceeding to determine the right, title and interest of the various defendants to an award in condemnation proceedings. The controversy arose over the claim of the state that the former owner of the condemned property, although he left a will, died intestate as to the real .estate in question and, he having no next of kin, the same escheated to the state.-

1Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Chase, Hogan, Cardozo, McLaughlin, Crane and Elkus, JJ.

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bean v. WalkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. LaFontaine's Heirs v. LaFontaine's HeirsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
  3. In re City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  4. In re the Estate of De StuersNew York Surrogate's Court · 1950
  5. Romel v. RealeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API