Legal Opinion

Pitz v. Town of Amherst Zoning Board of Appeals

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 19, 1993PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted the petition and annulled the determination of respondent Town of Amherst Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) that denied petitioner’s application for a building permit to construct a detached garage on his property. Under the circumstances of this case, respondent ZBA’s interpretation of the zoning ordinance, while entitled to deference, was arbitrary, unreasonable and irrational (see, Matter of Frishman v Schmidt, 61 NY2d 823, 825; Matter of Traveler Real Estate v Cain, 160 AD2d 1214, 1215; Gillen v Zoning…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Frishman v. SchmidtNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Frampton v. Zoning Board of Appeals for the Town of LloydAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Gillen v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Town of CortlandtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  4. Traveler Real Estate, Inc. v. CainAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Turner v. AndersenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. AA&L Associates, L. P. v. CasellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API