State v. Coats

(specially concurring). The writer is of the opinion that the information is not subject to demurrer and, therefore, he concurs in the result reached by the majority opinion.

The writer thinks that the information charges the crime of promoting and setting up a lottery and that it also charges the crime of conducting, maintaining and using a nickel-in-the-slot machine.

The writer cannot concur in holding that the information does not expressly admit that the operation and playing of the machine described therein involves a substantial amount of skill on the part of the player.

In the opinion of…