Legal Opinion

Valera v. Singh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 2011PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*930Contrary to the plaintiffs’ assertion, the defendant/third-party plaintiff and the third-party defendant met their prima facie burdens of showing on their respective motion and cross motion that the plaintiffs did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident (see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 NY2d 345 [2002]; Gaddy v Eyler, 79 NY2d 955, 956-957 [1992]). In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact.

The plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether either one of them sustained a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Toure v. Avis Rent a Car Systems, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Gaddy v. EylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Sainte-Aime v. HoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. Kauderer v. PentaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. Mejia v. DeRoseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Harrison v. ToyloyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API