Legal Opinion

Advance-Rumely Thresher Co. v. Bartzat

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1925No. 23852PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDean, J.

Plaintiff is a manufacturer and vendor of tractors, farm implements, and machinery, and maintains a branch agency at Lincoln. Defendant is a farmer and thresherman of 20 years’ experience and resides a few miles out of Lincoln. He bought a second-hand, rebuilt farm tractor from plaintiff, which is described as a “15-30 gas pull engine,” for which he executed a contract and four certain promissory notes for $200 each, bearing 8 per cent, yearly interest until-due and 10 per cent, thereafter. Defendant alleged failure of consideration,' and also that the notes were fraudulently obtained, and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. DutcherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  2. Pitsinowsky v. Beardsley, Hill & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1873
  3. Webster v. WrayNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1914
  5. Sanders v. NightengaleNebraska Supreme Court · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Shields v. County of BuffaloNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Pearce v. Elic Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Estate of Block v. Estate of BeckerNebraska Supreme Court · 2023
  4. Robinson Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Wendelin Baking Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Alpirn v. H. Epstein & Son, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API