Legal Opinion

State v. Pitts

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 14, 2013No. 11CR0129; A148787PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, P. J.

Defendant was charged with, among other crimes, first-degree burglary, ORS 164.225,1 on the ground that he entered a dwelling with the intent to commit the crime of interfering with a peace officer therein, ORS 162.247,2 by refusing to obey the officer’s lawful order to “stop.” Defendant moved for a judgment of acquittal on the theory that his refusal to obey the order was completed when he first disobeyed the officer’s command to stop; therefore, defendant argued, he could not have intended to commit that already-completed crime within the dwelling when, thereafter, he concededly entered it.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. J. N. S.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  3. State v. ChatelainOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. ChatelainCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. State v. BatsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. WernerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. State v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  3. State v. ScheirmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  4. State v. ThachSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API