State v. Pitts
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, P. J.
Defendant was charged with, among other crimes, first-degree burglary, ORS 164.225,1 on the ground that he entered a dwelling with the intent to commit the crime of interfering with a peace officer therein, ORS 162.247,2 by refusing to obey the officer’s lawful order to “stop.” Defendant moved for a judgment of acquittal on the theory that his refusal to obey the order was completed when he first disobeyed the officer’s command to stop; therefore, defendant argued, he could not have intended to commit that already-completed crime within the dwelling when, thereafter, he concededly entered it.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. J. N. S.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- State v. ChatelainOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. ChatelainCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- State v. BatsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. WernerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- State v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- State v. ScheirmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- State v. ThachSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016