Bostwick v. Isbell
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Application for the appointment of a receiver of tlie effects of a co-partnership, made under the act of 1867, to Judge Sanford, of the .Superior Court. The respondent demurred, the demurrer was overruled, a receiver appointed, and the case brought before this court by the respondent by a motion in error. The case is fully stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.
The proceedings in this case are based on “■ an act in addition to an act, entitled an act for the regulation of proceedings in equity.” Chapter 79 of the Acts of 1867.
The application to the judge is dated the 6th. of October, *3061873, and on the same day an ordei’ is entered appointing a receiver. A supplemental application was filed, dated the first of January, 1874, and on the 3d of January, 1874, the entry appears, “Respondent demurs, demurrer overruled. Motion in error allowed.” The motion in error is set forth at length,” and the errors assigned aro :—
“ 1. That judgment should have…
2Cited by4 opinions
- B. & O. Railroad v. P. W. & Ky. RailroadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1881
- Porter v. Orient InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1900
- Town of West Hartford v. ColemanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
- Northrop v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908