Legal Opinion

Haselo v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 7, 1919PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal by the defendant, The State of New York, from aia order and decision of the Court of Claims, entered in the office of the clerk of said court on the 2d day of November, 1918, awarding to claimants the sum of $9,438.32.

1Opinion of the Court

Woodward, J.:

On or about the 31st day of March, 1917, the State of New York filed its appropriation map of an island in the Mohawk river, in the vicinity of Schenectady, under the provisions of chapter 147 of the Laws of 1903, as amended, for the purposes of the Barge canal, the reputed owners of such island being the Haselo estate, or the claimants now before this court. The claimants have proceeded regularly in establishing their title to the island, the value of the same, and all of the necessary matters involved, and they have been awarded the sum of $9,438.32 for a permanent…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mohawk Bridge Co. v. Utica & Schenectady Rail RoadNew York Court of Chancery · 1837
  2. Williams v. . City of UticaNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Lewis v. City of UticaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. West Virginia Pulp & Paper Co. v. PeckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API