Legal Opinion

United States v. Albert Veneziale

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 29, 1959No. 12820_1PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HASTIE, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment for the defendant in a civil action by the United States for double damages and a statutory forfeiture under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C.A. § 231. The government’s complaint alleges that the defendant Veneziale caused George and Margaret Boyce to make a fraudulent application for a bank loan wherein it was falsely represented that the loan was wanted for home improvements-when it was in fact wanted and the proceeds were used to buy real property from Veneziale. This fraudulent application became one of the essential documents which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. United States v. McNinchSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. United States v. Martin TiegerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
  4. United States v. Harvey CochranCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. United States v. Alemany RiveraCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. Stanley N. Howell, Warren S. Cochran, Cochran & Howell, a Partnership, Post Cleaners, Thrifty CleanersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  3. United States v. Charles C. Hibbs, and Fairhill Company, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  4. United States of America, Cross-Appellee v. Cooperative Grain and Supply Co., Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
  5. United States v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API