Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Correct Printing Co. v. Ramapo River Printing Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 1, 1936Published

1Opinion of the Court

PATTERSON, District Judge.

The Correct Printing Company Case is one for infringement of registered trademark. The Hayes suit is for unfair competition, Hayes being a dealer in Massachusetts who handled the Correct Printing Company prqduct. Jurisdiction in the latter suit is based on diversity of citizenship. The two cases-were commenced at the same time and were tried together. A •preliminary injunction was given to the plaintiff in both cases by Judge Coxe. (D. ■C.) 9 F.Supp. 165.

The Correct Printing Company introduced a return post card folder in 1931, calling it “Automatic Post Card…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Coca-Cola Co. v. Koke Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Emack v. KaneUnited States Circuit Court · 1888
  3. Yale & Towne Mfg. Co. v. AlderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907
  4. Rushmore v. Manhattan Screw & Stamping WorksCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1908
  5. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API