Legal Opinion

Scholtz v. Yastrzemski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 15, 1936PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment dismissing the amended complaint on the merits in an action by a judgment creditor to set aside a mortgage as fraudulent under the Debtor and Creditor Law reversed on the law and the facts, with costs, and judgment directed for plaintiff, with costs. Findings of fact numbered 7 and 8 and the conclusions of law are reversed, and new findings and conclusions will be made. In our opinion the uncontradicted evidence establishes an actual intent on the part of defendants to defraud creditors both under the common law and under section 276 of the Debtor and Creditor Law. This is *824sufficient…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brody v. PecoraroNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Sabatino v. CannizzaroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lippe v. Bairnco Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
  2. Grumman Aerospace Corp. v. RiceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. Gafco, Inc. v. H. D. S. Mercantile Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1965
  4. Lipson v. H. M. R. Enterprises, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Takacs v. KapelaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API