Conroy v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY PRESIDENT
JUDGE COLINS.
Herein, the Court again addresses whether a licensee’s untimely filing of an appeal should permit the Department of Transportation (DOT) to suspend the licensee’s operating privilege pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. § 7002(b) (“Ignition Interlock Law”) where the ignition interlock requirement was imposed by DOT. We conclude that it does not; we affirm the order of the trial court granting nunc pro tunc relief and striking the requirement. The matter comes to this court by way of an appeal by DOT from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Chester County (trial court).
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Criss v. WiseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Commonwealth v. StockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Nassa v. Hook-SupeRx, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
- Watterson v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver LicensingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Hines v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver LicensingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cinquina v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver LicensingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Freedman v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver LicensingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Freedman v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver LicensingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004