Legal Opinion

Conroy v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 11, 2003PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY PRESIDENT

JUDGE COLINS.

Herein, the Court again addresses whether a licensee’s untimely filing of an appeal should permit the Department of Transportation (DOT) to suspend the licensee’s operating privilege pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. § 7002(b) (“Ignition Interlock Law”) where the ignition interlock requirement was imposed by DOT. We conclude that it does not; we affirm the order of the trial court granting nunc pro tunc relief and striking the requirement. The matter comes to this court by way of an appeal by DOT from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Chester County (trial court).

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Criss v. WiseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Commonwealth v. StockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Nassa v. Hook-SupeRx, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
  4. Watterson v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver LicensingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Hines v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver LicensingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cinquina v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver LicensingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Freedman v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver LicensingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Freedman v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver LicensingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API