Legal Opinion

Cruse v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided March 20, 1934No. 8 Div. 904PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

Appellants first insist that the court erred in overruling their demurrer to the affidavit upon which they were tried. Upon investigation we find certain demurrers set out in the transcript, but it is not shown by the judgment, or elsewhere in the record, that the demurrer was brought to the attention of •the court, or that the court made any ruling thereon, hence said demurrer will be treated as having been waived or abandoned and •cannot be reviewed on appeal.

The appellants were jointly charged, and jointly tried, upon an affidavit of one Will Strong, for the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dodson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. Shealy v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API