Legal Opinion

Nowell v. Union Mutual Fire Insurance

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 12, 1979No. 79-089PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a declaratory judgment brought by S. Carl Nowell (hereinafter the insured) to determine whether the Union Mutual Fire Insurance Co. (hereinafter Union Mutual) or the Amoskeag Insurance Agency (hereinafter Amoskeag) was liable to the insured for fire loss under a homeowner’s policy. The Trial Court (Cann, J.) ordered the policy reformed to cover the correct premises and placed the risk of loss first, as respects the insured, on Union Mutual, and then, as between Amoskeag and Union Mutual, on Amoskeag. Defendants’ exceptions were reserved and transferred. The sole question presented…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kierstead v. Betley Chevrolet-Buick, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  2. Ballou v. BallouSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  3. Dimock v. LussierSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1932
  4. Benner v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. of Idaho, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Starkeson v. StarkesonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carrier v. McLlarkySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
  2. Kelley v. Shelter Mutual InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Gemini Insurance Company v. Pelican General Insurance Agency, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API