Legal Opinion

State, Department of Human Resources ex rel. Haney v. Haney

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided August 22, 1990No. Civ. 7623PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTSON, Judge.

This is an alimony and child support modification case.

Hullette Haney and Hazel Haney were divorced in 1986. Pursuant to the court’s decree, adopting the agreement of the parties, the husband, Hullette Haney, was to pay the wife $130 per week, which represented both alimony for the wife and child support for the parties’ minor daughter and adult son. The amount of the husband’s obligation was to decrease $20 per week, when the parties’ adult son moved out of the wife’s house. Likewise, the obligation was to decrease another $20 per week when the minor daughter reached…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Taylor v. TaylorCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1986
  2. Ex Parte University of South AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Ebert v. EbertCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  4. Prentice v. PrenticeCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte TaborSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  2. Wilson v. HermansonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1995
  3. Hermsmeier v. McCoyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API