Legal Opinion

Fong Kong v. Nagle

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 21, 1932No. 6641PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAWTELLE, Circuit Judge.

This appeal arises from an order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Southern Division, de-, nying appellant’s petition for a writ of ha-beas corpus.

Fong Kong, the appellant, claims admission to the United States as the son of Fong Jug, who is admittedly a native-born citizen of the United States. Fong Jug has two sons, Fong Suey and Fong Ming, who were admitted to the United States on October 3, 1912, and August 7,1913, respectively.

The Board of Review, in upholding the exclusion order of the Board of Special Inquiry, relied…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Moy Said Ching v. TillinghastCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1927
  2. Nagle v. Wong DockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Been v. ProctorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
  2. Ward v. Flynn ex rel. Yee Gim LungCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API