Reed v. City of Anoka
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiffs from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, Harrison, J., denying a motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
This action was brought by plaintiffs, as freeholders and taxpayers of the city of Anoka, in their own behalf and in behalf of all other taxpayers of the city, against the city and its officers and the respondent Anoka Waterworks, Electric Light & Power Company, for the cancellation of certain contracts between the city and respondent, and praying that defendants, and each of them, be forever enjoined and restrained from further performance or compliance therewith. Defendant electric light company appeared and answered, denying some of the material allegations of the complaint, and setting…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Walla Walla City v. Walla Walla Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Illinois Trust & Savings Bank v. City of Arkansas CityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
- Grant v. City of DavenportSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
- City of East St. Louis v. East St. Louis Gas Light & Coke Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1881
- Los Angeles v. Los Angeles City Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- City of Big Spring v. Board of ControlTexas Supreme Court · 1966
- Griswold v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- St. Cloud Public Service Co. v. City of St. CloudSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Ambrozich v. City of EvelethSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- City of East Grand Forks v. LuckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.