Legal Opinion

Symons v. Van Every

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1955No. 32974PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinley, J.

This is an action for damages resulting from an alleged assault and battery. For the purposes of this opinion, it is sufficient to state that the parties to this action resided upon adjoining pieces of property; that the Van Everys objected to what they believed were trespasses upon their property, allegedly committed by Mr. Symons in using a back entrance to his place of residence; that words were exchanged between Mr. Symons and Mr. Van Every, and a fight ensued, during which Van Every allegedly struck and injured Symons and fractured Symons’ jaw in four places. The latter instituted this…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. Northern Express Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Quon v. Furuya Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Robbins v. GreeneWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Jensen v. SchlenzWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Leavitt v. De YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1953

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bellantonio v. WarnerWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Heggelund v. NordbyWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Anderson v. BeagleWashington Supreme Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API