(PS) Ackers v. California Employment Development Department

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 GREGORY ACKERS, No. 2:21cv-00244 JAM AC PS 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. ORDER 13 CALIFORNIA EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, and 14 GAVIN NEWSOM, 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was accordingly referred to the 18 undersigned by E.D. Cal. 302(c)(21). Plaintiff has filed a request for leave to proceed in forma 19 pauperis (“IFP”), and has submitted the affidavit required by that statute. See 28 U.S.C. 20 § 1915(a)(1). The motion to proceed IFP will therefore be…