Legal Opinion

Hoagland v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 30, 1999No. 98-2517Published

1Per curiam

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion pursuant to Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850. However, we reverse that part of the order barring appellant from filing any further pro se pleadings in this case and remand for further proceedings consistent with our opinions in Boston v. State, 722 So.2d 250 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998), *137and Spencer v. State, 717 So.2d 95 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part.

BOOTH, MINER AND VAN NORTWICK, JJ., CONCUR.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Spencer v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  2. Boston v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998