Robert Buist Co. v. Lancaster Mer. Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before.DANTZLER, J., Lancaster, March, 1903. Action by Robert Buist Co. against Lancaster Mercantile Co. From judgment for plaintiff, it appeals. cite: Verdict contrary to charge should be set aside: 16 S. C., 2; 19 S.-C., 489; 65 S. C., 197. Where there is no evidence to sustain a verdict, new trial should be granted: 45 S. C., 490; 14 S. C., 428; 19 S. C., 579; 54 S. C., 605. cite: Incompetent testimony not objected to, becomes competent: 35 S. C., 572; 52 S. C., 193.…
Read the full summary
Before.DANTZLER, J., Lancaster, March, 1903. Action by Robert Buist Co. against Lancaster Mercantile Co. From judgment for plaintiff, it appeals. cite: Verdict contrary to charge should be set aside: 16 S. C., 2; 19 S.-C., 489; 65 S. C., 197. Where there is no evidence to sustain a verdict, new trial should be granted: 45 S. C., 490; 14 S. C., 428; 19 S. C., 579; 54 S. C., 605. cite: Incompetent testimony not objected to, becomes competent: 35 S. C., 572; 52 S. C., 193. Exception based on misconception of Judge’s action, should be overruled: 50 S. C., 218; 49 S. C., 7. Failure to charge a…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Chiee Justice Pore.
Robert Buist Co., of Philadelphia, Pa., entered into a contract with the Lancaster Mercantile Co., a corporation located at Lancaster, S. C., of which the following is a copy:
“The consolidated order, marked ‘A’ above, reads as follows :
'John Mahan. Order No: 192.. Lancaster, Oct. 24, 1900. Robert Buist Co., Philadelphia, Pa. Order X sheet.
Onion sets: Bbls. Price per bush.
Yellow or red.'........... 5. ■.................. 2 25
White or silver skin........3. .-................. 2 75
Seed potatoes: Bbls. Price.
Ploulton Maine…
2Cited by7 opinions
- State ex rel. Jones v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Blowers v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1906
- Brooks v. JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
- Cooper & Griffin, Inc. v. W. C. Cooke & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
- Walter Pratt & Co. v. Frasier & Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1905
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.