Legal Opinion · Concurrence

MASSEY CHEVROLET, INC. v. Aderhold

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 22, 2009No. 1080560Published

1ConcurrenceMurdock, Justice

I concur in denying the petition for a writ of certiorari filed by Travis Aderhold. I do not wish, however, to be understood as necessarily agreeing with the analysis in the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals in this case. Ex parte Massey Chevrolet, Inc., 23 So.3d 33 (Ala.Civ.App.2009). The Court of Civil Appeals held that Ader-hold’s employer, Massey Chevrolet, Inc., was liable under the Alabama Workers’ Compensation Act for paying for procedures and treatments administered to Ad-erhold by Dr. Charles Aprill to the extent that those procedures and treatments were authorized by Dr. Chris…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Southeast Alabama Medical CenterCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002
  2. Ex Parte Alabama Power Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  3. Testa Distributing Co., Inc. v. TarverLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. Overnite Transp. Co. v. McDuffieCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2005
  5. Aderhold v. Massey Chevrolet, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API