Legal Opinion

Rescia v. Waldrop

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 14, 1937No. 7 Div. 380PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The suit was for injunction and the decree dismissed the same.

The appellee had leased the property to Tom Rescia, who, it is/alleged, breached the terms of his lease, and the owner sought by unlawful detainer to recover possession of the property.

There was a bill to abate a public nuisance maintained and committed on the premises, and injunction restraining Rescia and his sublessees from engaging in such unlawful acts on the premises.-

It is alleged that appellee’s lease of said property to Rescia had been breached and by the terms of said lease appellee is the “rightful owner…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hodge v. JoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1921

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Foster v. FosterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  2. Finney v. StorySupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  3. Clark v. WoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API