Miles v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Townsend, Judge.
In his petition for certiorari the defendant assigns error because the prosecutrix, Margaret Hunt Miles, testified on direct examination: “1 don't think there had been any discussion between me and Byron concerning money, that he was dissatisfied with the amount I gave him.” Counsel for the State then asked: “Could that have been the reason he beat you in October, 1958?” The witness replied, “No, sir”, and counsel for the defendant objected to the latter question and answer on the ground that it constituted an opinion. Opinions and inferences of witnesses not based on facts…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Marshall v. PierceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
- Braxley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
- Howell v. HowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1877
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
- Daniel v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Anderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Southern Guaranty Insurance Co. of Georgia v. AshCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989