Legal Opinion

Mersereau v. L. K. Hirsch Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1907PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action by William B. Merserea.u against the L. K. Hirsch Company. Motion to vacate an attachment. Motion denied,

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

It is stated in defendant’s brief that lien by reason of attachment has been released and bond given by defendant, and defendant asks that bond be canceled upon vacation of attachment. It thus appears that plaintiff will be remediless if attachment is set aside. Motion is made on original papers, defendant claiming that judge granting attachment did not have jurisdiction for reason that plaintiff’s papers upon which attachment was granted did not show that defendant was a foreign corporation; that while plaintiff’s affidavit positively states that defendant is a foreign corporation, such…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Penticost v. MasseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  2. Dowdell v. BeasleyAlabama Court of Appeals · 1919
  3. Geduld v. BaltimoreAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1911
  4. Mersereau v. L. K. Hirsch Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API