Legal Opinion

Wheaton and Donaldson v. Peters and Grigg

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 19, 1834Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

33 U.S. 591 (____)

8 Pet. 591

HENRY WHEATON AND ROBERT DONALDSON, APPELLANTS

v.

RICHARD PETERS AND JOHN GRIGG.

Supreme Court of United States.

The case was argued by Mr Paine and Mr Webster, for the appellants; and by Mr Ingersoll, by a printed argument, and Mr Sergeant, for the defendants.

2Opinion of the Court · M'LeanJustice M'Lean

After stating the case, he proceeded:

Some of the questions which arise in this case are as novel, in this country, as they are interesting. But one case involving similar principles, except a decision by a state court, has occurred; and that was decided by the circuit court of the United States for the district…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wheaton and Donaldson v. Peters and GriggSupreme Court of the United States · 1834
  2. Morris's Lessee v. VanderenSupreme Court of the United States · 1782
  3. Nichols v. RugglesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut · 1808

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API