Chowning v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.
GRAVES, Judge.
Appellant in his motion for a rehearing insists that we erred in holding the indictment in this case sufficient to charge an offense against the law, because it does not appear from the alleged forged instrument that Williams had authority to act for and on behalf of the Banner Creameries in signing, its name thereto, and that the indictment should have averred that Williams had the authority to thus bind the Banner Creameries,
Does the instrument purport to be the act of Banner Creameries without the word “by” preceding the name “C. 0. Williams?” We think…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cross v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1868
- Howard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
- Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Brod v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1900
- State v. GoodrichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.