Legal Opinion · Dissent

Golding v. R.K.O. Pictures, Inc.

California Supreme Court

Decided August 4, 1950No. L. A. 20699Published

1Dissent

TRAYNOR, J. Dissenting.

The majority opinion in this case, unlike that in Stanley v. Columbia Broadcasting System, ante, p. 653 [221 P.2d 73], recognizes that the question whether there has been copying of plaintiffs’ work cannot be submitted to the jury until it has been determined by the trial judge that there is evidence of substantial similarity between plaintiffs’ play and defendants’ motion picture with respect to the protectible features of plaintiffs’ play. With these conflicting decisions before him, may a trial judge on motion for nonsuit or directed verdict determine on the…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Nichols v. Universal Pictures CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  2. Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithographing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. Sheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
  4. Universal Pictures Co. v. Harold Lloyd CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
  5. Fred Fisher, Inc. v. DillinghamDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1924

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API