Legal Opinion

Dimock v. Kadane

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 6, 2003No. 11-01-00354-CVPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

W.G. ARNOT, III, Chief Justice.

Joe W. Dimock (Dimoek) and E.W. Moran Drilling Company (Moran) brought this partition action against Louise Kadane, Michael L. Gustafson, and Carr Staley as Co-Trustees of the Louise Trust and Ka-dane II, L.L.C. (the Kadane Defendants); Mark W. Gray; and Michael L. Gustaf-son.1 Dimock, Moran, and the Defendants are tenants in common in oil and gas leases. In the trial court, Dimock and Moran sought a partition by sale of the parties’ undivided interests in the leases. The Ka-dane Defendants filed a counterclaim for declaratory judgment. They asserted that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Oake v. Collin CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Stable Energy, L.P. v. Kachina Oil & Gas, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001
  3. Warner v. WinnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
  4. Lichtenstein v. Lichtenstein Building CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
  5. Elrod v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ivarene and Victor Hosek v. Rosale Scott, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API