Legal Opinion

Borrowman v. Insurance Co. of North America

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 19, 1993PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: We reject respondent’s contention that Supreme Court lacked jurisdiction to entertain petitioners’ application for approval, nunc pro tunc, of petitioners’ settlement of a third-party action pursuant to Workers’ Compensation Law § 29 (5). The Court of Common Pleas of Erie County, Pennsylvania, in which the third-party action was pending, declined to exercise jurisdiction on the ground that New York provided a more appropriate forum to resolve the matter (cf., Matter of Daly v Daly Constr. Corp., 136 AD2d 798, 800, lv denied 72 NY2d 807).

The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Merrill v. MoultrieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. Claim of Daly v. Michael Daly Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. Anzalone v. Traveler's InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bernthon v. Utica Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. Severino v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Dauenhauer v. Continental Casualty InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. Buchanan v. ScovilleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  5. Gregory v. Aetna InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API