Legal Opinion

People v. Pinkham

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 30, 1985No. 82-1008PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE NASH

delivered the opinion of the court:

Defendant, Michael Pinkham, was convicted in a bench trial of residential burglary and aggravated battery and was sentenced to concurrent terms of 10 years’ imprisonment. He appeals, contending that the circuit court erred in denying his motion to suppress his confession on the grounds that his statements were induced by threats and by promises of leniency and that they were elicited despite his requests for counsel.

At the pretrial hearing of defendant’s motion to suppress, Detective Richard Whitmore testified that on May 9, 1982, he…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. People v. PrimIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
  3. The People v. HartgravesIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
  4. People v. KruegerIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  5. People v. PrudeIllinois Supreme Court · 1977

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. TravisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  2. People v. CreamerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  3. People v. CleesenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  4. People v. BennettAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API