Legal Opinion

In re Percy

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided December 17, 1968No. Civ. 68-85SPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

NICHOL, Chief Judge.

This is a habeas corpus proceeding in accordance with Title 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Dale Percy (hereinafter called petitioner) claims that his ultimate trial and conviction were violative of his constitutional and statutory guarantees of protection against double jeopardy pursuant to Article V of the United States Constitution and Article VI, Section 9, of the Constitution of the State of South Dakota. In the alternative the petitioner claims that the greater sentence imposed upon his trial for kidnapping is illegal and requests relief pursuant to Rule 35…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. People v. HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Eddie W. Patton v. State of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
  4. Pasquale J. Marano, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1967
  5. United States v. Harry Robert WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API