Legal Opinion

Zion Baptist Church v. Hebert

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 18, 1933No. 12,820PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holland

Plaintive in error was defendant in the court below and will be referred to as the church, and the defendant in error as the contractor.

In August, 1925, the contractor filed his complaint on quantum meruit for labor and material furnished in connection with the installation of a heating plant for the church, claiming that the work performed and the material furnished were reasonably worth $3,284.54.' $67.44 and $8.12 were claimed on second and third causes of action for small extras. These last two items were uncontroverted. The answer of the church pleaded a written contract, which was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bruce v. PearsallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1896

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. BoveeColorado Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Meinhardt v. Investment Builders Properties Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Jacobs v. JonesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API