Legal Opinion

Shortridge v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 8, 2004No. 2D03-5811PublishedCited by 232 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

884 So.2d 321 (2004)

Jonathan SHORTRIDGE, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2D03-5811.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

September 8, 2004.

CANADY, Judge.

Jonathan Shortridge challenges the denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Because the two claims raised by Shortridge relate to convictions and not sentences, they are not cognizable under rule 3.800(a). See Rudolf v. State, 851 So.2d 839 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003). One of the issues raised by Shortridge is a challenge based on the procedure used by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rudolf v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

3Cited by232 opinions

  1. Kirby v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  2. Prince v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  3. Welch v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  4. ADONIUS BAILEY v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  5. ALFONSO K. WILLIAMS v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019

227 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API